DICTATORSHIP. Philosopher Clive Hamilton and sinologist Mareike Ohlberg are attempting to make a comprehensive approach to how China and the Chinese Communist Party are handling their foreign interests in a globalised world in their “Hidden Hand – Exposing how the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World”.

When Samuel. P Huntington wrote about the clash of civilisations in his essay with the same name, the Chinese culture was already one of seven examples, depending on how one is counting, that he emphasised.

His thesis has been pondered upon and analysed since he wrote the essay. I am not wholly convinced that we have come closer to a consensus in the public debate. The recent pandemic has put the world at a stop due to the outbreak of Covid-19 in Wuhan. It has also led to the world’s relations with China and the Chinese Communist party being brought into the limelight. 

In the book “Hidden Hand – Exposing how the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World” writers Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg are attempting to make a comprehensive approach to how China and the Chinese Communist Party are handling their foreign interests in a globalised world. Even Sweden has been affected, for example, in a way that the Swedish citizen Gui Minhai has not been heard or seen of since 2018. 

As a writer and book publisher, Minhai was convicted to ten years of prison in 2020. Questions about his captivity have been raised several times, but from CCP:s point of view, the case is closed. The reason being that Minhai was rumoured to publish a book called “Xi Jinping and his mistresses” something that really has provoked the CCP and especially it’s leader Xi Jinping. Minahi’s case is mentioned in the book. 

When discussing China, it is important to understand that it is Xi Jinping, CCP:s chairman since 2013 and probably the most powerful politician in the world, who is in charge of things. During Xi Jinping’s time at power, the tune has been sharpened against everything and everyone who could be seen as a threat to China and CCP:s interest internally and globally.

In the book, which is one of the more informative published about Chinese politics, the writers show in several areas and examples the real influence of the CCP. It is an appalling reading. CCP’s attempts to increase its influences over the electrical infrastructure,  intellectual property and raw materials will be difficult to ignore.

 With one example after another, the writers present the economic and intellectual influence that the CCP has over the West and its different institutions. Even examples where Chinese interests have bought whole institutions. The book’s credibility is high concerning which examples the writers have chosen, showing how ridiculously unaware the West’s economic elite have been for years.

Countries like Australia, Canada, the UK and the USA, have many times been naive concerning how they handled the extention and magnitude of Chinese influence. The writers are taking up several examples when governments and interest groups have been convinced of China’s legitimate measures, while the requirements of compensation have been almost nonexistent among western stakeholders. 

CCP:s influence is both economical and strategical.

Cooperations with many western scientists and software developers are an important factor for CCP, and is something which the CCP is working on in order to become a global leader in IT. To this, espionage and cyberhacking can be added, with direct and indirect traces to China, which have increased dramatically during the last years.

Today, university after university are establishing long-term cooperations with Chinese interests, ultimately leading to CCP’s security organisations that actively are searching for new knowledge areas to develop. The digital strategy of CCP has been clear. It is about creating a Chinese future, including everything that enables digital control over the population. Something that the citizens of Hong Kong already have experienced during the last years. 

 It is not an exaggeration to call mainland China one of the most monitored and surveilled areas in the world, especially in big cities. This specific surveillance policy is directly ordered and cherished by the highest levels in CCP.  The CCP’s political rhetoric speaks about dissidents and traitors, lessons learned from the fall of the U.S.S.R. 

Something which has characterised Xi Jinping’s time in power is the constant fear that CCP will lose its legitimacy and be overthrown. There is no price too high to pay when it comes to CCP’s dominance internally and globally. 

Corruption within the party are continually occurring and have become a high priority for  Xi Jinping’s leadership. The many exposures and trials connected to corruption speak volumes. Also, it is an easy way to get rid of one’s political rivals to the chairman post. As stated on a real poster with Xi Jinping pictured in 2014: “The question of corruption is completely critical, flies as well as tigers have to be smashed”. 

”Belt and Road- Initiative” (BRI), a project with over 70 participating countries, is one of the world’s most comprehensive infrastructure projects. China is providing a helping hand to developing countries and other stakeholders to create large infrastructure projects. 

And it is not only out of generosity that the BRI is performed since, in the end, it is also about China getting more control over harbours, other types of infrastructure and raw-materials in relevant countries. Something that countries like Malaysia and Kenya experienced the hard way. For example, Mombasa – Kenya’s largest harbour-  became Chinese owned after the Kenyan government could not repay their construction loans. 

I see very few chances that other countries will have the will and power to break down the Chinese influence in the short term. Despite the concerns with demographic problems,  because of the former one-child policy, the CCP are unwilling to drop their control of mainland China and other parts of the world.

The post China’s hidden hand first appeared on Opulens.

CONFLICT. The only uninhabited continent could play a role in the political scene in the coming years. Due to the growing influence and role of environmental activists – Antarctica is becoming increasingly important, writes Filip Đukić. 

In the 1950s, Antarctica was perceived as a sterile, cold continent that was inhospitable for living. With constant reference to climate change and the Coronavirus pandemic, the status of Antarctica has changed.

As the political situation is geopolitical in most cases – in this case, is in full form – it is so predictable that national interests will strengthen. We can notice the strongest national interest in it – the Chinese one. And while other countries have begun to delay and cut funding for Antarctic exploration, the Chinese have decided to embark on building the largest Antarctic – krill-fishing boat – in the world that will be completed by 2023.

The economic potential of Antarctica is also increasingly coming to light. Minerals, commercial fishing, tourism are just some of the reasons that are increasingly attracting countries around the world to take an even stronger position in the race for Antarctica.

Antarctica is known for its extreme preservation, as ironic as it may sound due to increasing climate change. We can say that geopolitics is only partly going in the direction that the Nazis once had; the doctrine of Karl Haushofer, geopolitics for militaristic goals.

Antarctica may still not be a hospitable place to live, but a country that has any domination over it – will have a variety of options. With that control, you have a monopoly over the world in various aspects. 

Today’s geopolitics – as in this case linked to Antarctica – is an opportunity for manipulation. In other words – whoever has primacy over Antarctica will be able to dictate real and imaginary problems as far as global warming is concerned. That is not fictitious, and utopian thinking as climate change creates the emergence of various treaties and agreements between states on the issue of greenhouse gases.

Yes, national interests can go so far that non-national Antarctica can be nationalized. If scientists of specific states are in the field (and state and politics have their fingers in science as well, which is not something new), the same country can dictate pieces of information related to global warming. Yes, WikiLeaks shows that. 

The result would be a change in agreements such as the Paris Agreement. Although there are seven states; New Zealand, Australia, France, Norway, the United Kingdom, Chile, and Argentina in Antarctica as part of a research team – I expect China to take a step forward and claim the right to the territory.

The Antarctic Treaty and Article IV – which prevent the claim to national sovereignty of any state in the Antarctic continent – are still in force for the time being. China, the biggest polluter on the planet, will surely build even more of its research stations. The Chinese also have the most isolated station called Kunlun and are even more elusive from international control.

Although some experts, such as Professor Brady claims that the Chinese have a militaristic intention towards Antarctica – my opinion is that they are more interested in the research part. With that, they can more easily come up with the idea of national sovereignty in Antarctica. 

Antarctica may still not be a hospitable place to live, but a country that has any domination over it – will have a variety of options. With that control, you have a monopoly over the world in various aspects. 

The post Antarctica can give a monopoly first appeared on Opulens.